In light of Gwas’s recent post on Orbs we decided to do some independant questioning from a distance of 250 miles apart. Here are the questions and results…
| Question | Kal | Gwas |
| Is it a fluke or malfunction of the camera? | Yes | No |
| Is it a Faerie? | Yes | Yes |
| Is it a Tree spirit | No | No |
| Is it a Elemental (what kind?) | No | No |
| Is it a power center? | No | No |
| Is it a anomalous energy | No | No |
| Is it aware? | Yes | Yes |
| Did it want to be seen? | Yes | Yes |
| Was it friendly? | Yes | Yes |
Gwas also notes:-
- It was a powerful thing, but not a power centre as we would call it (i.e. it was spirit energy, not telluric or celestial energy, and as distinct from elemental energy).
- It enjoyed my interaction with it and the tree
- The tree is its home, but it is not tied to the tree inherently.
- The other orb in the background was another faery.
- It was not caused by a fault of the camera, nor was it due to a spot of rain or shaft of sunlight hitting the lens in an unusual way.
Kal also notes:-
- That it was connected to the tree (lived in it)
- It was what I might call a Dryad
- It was a fluke of the camera that made it appear (i.e. it wouldn’t have done normally).
CONCLUSION
It was definitely a faery. It lived in or around that tree. It meant to be seen, and somehow the camera managed to pick that up. It was a tree nymph also known as a dryad.
Looking forward to more of this kind of confirmatory dowsing.
Kal Malik
