On the edge – what got left out

A year ago I did some really fascinating house energy work. Here is a link to the post. During the course of the investigation and clearance several interesting experiences emerged and required exploration.

Evil

An Energetic Awareness of some kind was discovered in the house. Fair enough and nothing unusual in our world, however this one cropped up in the dowsing sensor as EVIL. What was that about? Why evil? What does it mean? Why not negative energy? Or even bad energy?

A lion attacking and killing a child couldn’t really considered to be Evil because it’s just following its nature. There are many entities out there that feed on emotional energy, some feed on good emotional energy (like love) and some on bad ones. Even considering that they might cause this type of energy to be generated from the people/environment, like farmers rearing animals.

Angels and Demons is a perspective that I have toyed with over the years. Angels being entities that feed on good emotions and Demons being ones that feed of bad. This isn’t a slant on actual angels (if they exist) but rather defining an entity to some extent. Perhaps Vegetarian and Carnivore would be less provocative?

I did some post event dowsing on this matter and found the following result. It came up as evil because it was (intelligently) aware that it was causing damage to Peter and to the Mother and Daughter of the house. Further dowsing revealed that although other (lesser?) entities might feed of emotions and sometimes cause them, they were doing so instinctively.

Many moons ago I used to observe an exorcist at work. Trust me when I say the truth is scarier than the fiction. Anyway, I learned a thing or two about protection from him and so on learning that this beastie was intelligent, before leaving Peter’s house I did some warding on him and myself.

 Although we were in no danger of being possessed I was in danger of being followed and plagued by this beast. And frankly, no thanks!

GWAS: I think this brings us neatly to a philosophical distinction of what EVIL is. To my way of thinking you have it in a nutshell. Evil is the intended harm of another entity for personal gain, and with little or no thought for the consequences of the other. You do right to bring into the equation a judgement of ‘necessity’. Lions need to eat, so they intentionally do harm to another entity without thought of the consequences, but this is done out of necessity. They don’t waste energy on killing for sport or for the pleasure it may bring. When we see harm being caused we bring a judgement of the necessity of that act. In the case of energetic vampirism or psychic attacks we are somewhat handicapped in terms of our senses in that realm and so may find it even more difficult to evaluate the necessity of such an act, however self-preservation requires that we treat such attacks as ‘hostile’ and as part of that process we inevitably, for our own motivation, label such acts as evil. When we get attacked we see the attacker as “ill intentioned” and this equates with the shorthand concept of evil for the person being attacked. What we must remember, though, is that such judgements are relative to ourselves. We are only ever judging the “evil” act from our own perspective, even if we project into the place of another out of sympathy.

Focus

Where focus goes energy flows is an adage that I have come across before but in this experience there was an interesting twist in that I was warned off focusing on (or probing) the thing as it would become aware of it and use it against me.

Post event dowsing confirmed that it would have indeed become aware of me. It seems that focusing causes a bridge to be created between the two, one that an energy sensitive can detect and use. (Dowsing tells me that) This beastie was very energy sensitive, almost akin to our sight. Also I found that it could have sent negative emanations along the ‘focus’ bridge at me.

Actually now that I write about this I recall one of my first ever weird house dowses when I learned that someone had cast a spell (take it as you believe it) on a house and the occupant. At that time I speculated as to whether I could detect who had done it. The answer was yes, but that he/she would know that I had found out. A quick dowse confirmed that I was not knowledgeable enough (at that time) to be able to deal with that person.

GWAS: Focus or intent? Or does one focus one’s intent? Is focus the direction and intent the motivation by which, or source from which, the energy is projected towards the focal point? One may focus on something but unless one intends something, then nothing will result from that, as there is no transfer of energy without intent.

Catalyst

Another person had to be in the house too, kind of like a catalyst, for the energy transfer  to take place. I think this is a really important find. Worth exploring later.

Mother and Daughter

I am often wary of dowsing for answers that are (or will be) untestable. However one reader of these tales (Sundaemon) posed an interesting question/thought.

• Did burning the diaries of the daughter have any effect on either or both the mum and daughter?

It is an interesting question and since my immediate concern was the welfare of the current house owner I didn’t pay this angle much attention. As I pondered this, another thought occurred to me. Could or would the beastie find the mother or daughter again and latch onto their new home (wherever this would be)?

Dowsing for both of these questions revealed the following:

• Yes, the daughter would be positively affected by the burning of the diaries (at a level of 4 out of 10, but I don’t know what this scale means).
• No, the mother was unaffected by the diaries being burned.
• No, the Critter couldn’t trace back to the family again.

Final note for the moment

I was contacted by Peter a few days later and he reported that no nightmares had been experienced and that after having extensively read through the daughters diaries he wanted to locate them and get in touch. In honesty I didn’t know what to think of this and didn’t bother to have an opinion. However I did let him know that I was interested in what he might find.

Kal Malik